1999
Post Millennial Fizzy (Addressing the Possibility of the Future)
November 3 – December 19, 1999
November 3 – December 19, 1999
The Beaver College Art Gallery is pleased to present “Post Millennial Fizzy (Addressing the Possibility of the Future),” a group exhibition considering utopia, dystopia, and 21st-century culture. Co-curated by painter Adam Ross and Julie Joyce, director of the Luckman Fine Arts Gallery at California State University, Los Angeles, the exhibition features multimedia works by eleven Los Angeles-based artists, most of whom are presenting their work on the east coast for the first time. The exhibition opens November 3, 1999 with a reception for the artists starting at 7:30 PM preceded by a slide lecture by exhibition curators Ross and Joyce starting at 6:30 PM in Stiteler Auditorium, Murphy Hall, adjacent to the Art Gallery. “Post Millennial Fizzy” remains on view through December 19, 1999.
Installation view, “Post Millennial Fizzy (Addressing the Possibility of the Future),” Beaver College Art Gallery
The exhibition takes its name from a fictional soft drink consumed in a novel about post-Y2K America by acclaimed author David Foster Wallace entitled Infinite Jest (1995). In his 1073-page epic, Wallace describes an entertainment-obsessed society addicted to a movie so engaging that anyone who watches it loses all desire to do anything else. Focusing on concepts related to the future, rather than a futuristic aesthetic per se, the works in the exhibition become platforms for speculation whose ends are as resourceful, critical, inspiring, or as preposterous as those found in Wallace’s novel. While many of the artists included employ some form of technology, just as many eschew it for materials that are pointedly handmade. Whether cynical or utopian in their projections, most of the artists emulate advanced ideas regarding marketing, design and lifestyle.
“Post Millennial Fizzy” was first presented at the Luckman Fine Arts Gallery, Los Angeles, a city – due in part to the industries and attitudes that rise from it – is often associated with the manufacture of the future. The show’s presentation in Glenside is funded by grants from the Pennsylvania Council on the Arts and the Friends and Advisory Board of the Beaver College Art Gallery.
Works on Paper
September 9 – October 24, 1999
September 9 – October 24, 1999
The Beaver College Art Gallery is pleased to present its biennial “Works on Paper” exhibition, a juried show this year featuring 31 area artists, from September 9 through October 24, 1999. This year’s exhibition was selected by James Elaine, Artist and Curator of Contemporary Projects, UCLA Hammer Museum, (formerly Curator of Contemporary Exhibitions/Viewing Program Coordinator, The Drawing Center, New York).
The exhibition opens with a reception on Tuesday, September 14 at 6:30 PM beginning with a lecture by Museum of Modern Art Department of Drawing Curator Laura Hoptman to be presented at Beaver’s Stiteler Auditorium, directly adjacent to the gallery.
Elaine chose 34 works from 710 entries submitted by a record total of 371 regional artists. The artists–both emerging and established–are Susan Arthur, Joe Begonia, Matt Bergen, Randy Bolton, Marina Borker, Astrid Bowlby, Mark Campbell, Geoffrey DeMasi, Kevin Finklea, Alan Goldstein, Richard Harrod, Joseph Ives, Leroy Johnson, Brad Kalin (North Wales), David Kettner (Melrose Park), Deborah Kogan (Wyndmoor), Rodger LaPelle, Joanne Maynard (Doylestown), Jeremiah Misfeldt, Joseph Moser (Oreland), Steve Riedell, Scott Rigby, Paco Rodriguez, Judith Taylor, Geri Tuckett, Buy Shaver, Nancy Sophy, Kevin Strickland, Anne Seidman, Matt Wine (Melrose Park), Barbara Woodall and Base Kamp–a collaborative, not-for-profit studio/gallery run by David Dempewolf, Justine Matherly, Scott Rigby. (Unless otherwise indicated, all the artists listed reside in Philadelphia.)
Beaver’s “Works on Paper” exhibition remains one of the few juried shows in the area selected from actual artworks, as opposed to 35mm slides. This year’s show, while presenting a range of media–including photography, collage, and text-based conceptual projects–celebrates the formal economy of drawing and the virtues of paper as material support. Examples of interest include David Kettner’s graphic analysis of a child’s depiction of his father, spectral abstractions in oilstick and walnut oil by Alan Goldstein and Nancy Sophy, Steve Riedell’s spiralling discs of collaged song lyrics, and Joe Begonia’s graphite abstractions inspired by loudspeaker designs. A nocturnal,
suburban malaise emerges as the theme of works by Susan Arthur, Matt Bergen, and Mark Campbell. Base Kamp’s Failed Attempt at Shameless Self Promotion is a topical exercise documenting the artists’ ironic and exploitative encounters with Vito Acconci, Kiki Smith, and Sol LeWitt at recent Philadelphia receptions for these “famous artists.”
Laura Hoptman’s lecture will place Beaver’s “Works on Paper” show in a broader, contemporary context. Scheduled to begin at 6:30 PM on September 14th in Stiteler Auditorium, it is entitled “Drawing is a Noun: Working on Paper Today” and will address those factors Hoptman believes distinguish current drawing from work made as recently as 15 years ago. Hoptman’s curatorial endeavors at MoMA include “Sight Gags: Grotesque, Caricature, and Wit in Modern and Contemporary Drawing,” “Drawing on Chance,” and highly acclaimed shows for MoMA’s “Projects” series featuring Maurizio Cattelan, John Currin, Elizabeth Peyton, and Luc Tuymans.
A public reception for the participating artists will commence in the gallery immediately following the lecture.
Over the course of the exhibition, over $1,200 in cash will be awarded to five participating artists, including the Mildred Bougher Award ($500) and the Beaver College purchase award ($300). In addition, the Philadelphia Museum of Art will select a work for consideration for its permanent collection. All exhibiting artists also become eligible for inclusion in the gallery’s biennial “Closer Look” series. These group shows–each selected by an independent regional curator–feature 3 to 5 artists in greater depth while highlighting thematic relationships among their works.
The 1999 “Works on Paper” exhibition is supported by grants from the Samuel S. Fels Fund, the Pennsylvania Council on the Arts, and the Friends and Advisory Board of Beaver College Art Gallery.
Faculty Exhibition
March 25 – April 22, 1999
March 25 – April 22, 1999
Painting Pictures: Rendering the [Photo] Real
February 20 – March 21, 1999
February 20 – March 21, 1999
Beaver College Art Gallery is pleased to present “Painting Pictures–rendering the [photo]real,” a group exhibition of works by Matthew Antezzo, Judie Bamber, Peter Cain, Marilyn Minter, Mary Murphy, Richard Phillips, Paul Winstanley, and Kevin Wolff. Exploring the use of photographs as subjects for contemporary paintings, the exhibition will be on view from February 20 through March 21, 1999. Educational events include a gallery talk by exhibition curator, Richard Torchia, scheduled for Thursday, February 25 at 12:15 PM in the art gallery, and a lecture by participating artist, Indianapolis-based painter Kevin Wolff on Thursday March 4, at 6:30 PM in the Stiteler Auditorium, Murphy Hall. Wolff’s lecture will be followed immediately by a public reception in the Art Gallery.
“Painting Pictures” presents fourteen paintings on canvas, aluminum, wood, and paper that consciously employ photographs as their subjects in the literal, often labor-intensive manner of “photorealism” but with a range of intentions, procedures, and effects that would have been unlikely in 1970 when this term was first used to name the work of painters Richard Estes, Robert Bechtle and others. The practice of realistically transcribing photographs into paint on canvas, sometimes disparaged as a conservative derivation of pop art driven by a numbing technique, has nevertheless persisted into the 1990s. Spurred, perhaps, by the current reconsideration of seventies culture, in the past five years the word “photorealist” has been difficult to suppress as an effective term to describe the work of numerous critically acclaimed painters.
The exhibition serves as a way to mark the current impact of photography on painting, as well as to index critical shifts in both practices over the past thirty years. Works by Peter Cain (1959-1998), Kevin Wolff (Indianapolis) and Paul Winstanley (Great Britain) demonstrate photography’s new role as a highly adaptable source of both verisimilitude and abstraction. Mary Murphy (Philadelphia) and Judie Bamber (Los Angeles), use photos as a way to make an almost tactile, visceral contact with the recent past or as a method of mitigating personal loss. In the work of New York-based artist Matthew Antezzo, the material transformation from print to paint unleashes ideological and psychological content only latent in the original photographs. Other works in the exhibition demonstrate the lessons of 1980s appropriation art (Richard Phillips) the contemporary resurgence of figuration (Marilyn Minter), and the cultural primacy of painting despite the ubiquitous presence of photography within the mass media.
The exhibition is funded by grants from the Arcadia Foundation, the Pennsylvania Council on the Arts, and the Advisory Board and Friends of the Beaver College Art Gallery.
Since 1993 Matthew Antezzo has been basing his large-scale, grisaille paintings on photographs documenting performances and installations from the late 1960s and early 1970s. He selects works such Maggie Lowe’s Explosion (in which the artist detonated a pair of Hostess “Snoballs”) and whose existence is entirely dependent on its having been published in an art magazine (in this case, Art in America., Jan-Feb 1971, also the title of the work). While Antezzo’s translation of Lowe’s convention-challenging performance into an heroically scaled oil painting is not without its irony, his canvas strives to rescue an ephemeral gesture from certain cultural amnesia. Antezzo’s work can thus be read as an act of affection, if not for Lowe’s work in particular, for the epoch of radical experimentation for which it is emblematic.
Photographs from 1960s/70s publications also provide the sources for the recent paintings of Richard Phillips. These large-scale canvases, several of which were included in 1997 Whitney Biennial, typically depict the close-cropped faces of fashion models rendered at billboard scale and in a manner that equates the sensuous reality of oil paint on linen with the artifice of cosmetic beauty. In Transfixed, the model’s head is enveloped in a shadow of deep purple pierced by a vignetted spotlight that transforms her face into a blank mask blinded by glamour.
Phillips’ indulgence in the surface of painting as analog for the superficial allure perpetrated by the fashion industry becomes the target of works by Marilyn Minter. The two enamel paintings on aluminum eschew her signature, Ab-Ex “drips” in an effort to exploit the fetishism of what Minter recently referred to as “photo-shop realism.” Based on photos she scans into a computer, digitally alters, and then transcribes into shiny paintings on metal panels, often applying the enamel with her own fingertips, works such as Finger Toes Study expose forms of horror that can lie beneath glamour’s thin veil. In this tightly cropped collage, Minter seamlessly joins a hyper-real image of a glossy fingernail with a similarly cropped detail of a frosted toenail, suggesting that model’s hand has been monstrously deformed.
Judie Bamber employs her technical virtuosity to both ideological and personal ends. Her Untitled #1 is a life sized, tightly cropped close-up of female genitals. Scrupulously painted in oil on a piece of wood 6” x 1 3/4” x 2”, the work has an object-like (even phallic) presence that reverses Freudian readings of “female lack.” Based on a photograph, its extended sense of time and focused looking transcend the limits of camera vision and subvert taboos in viewers male and female, gay and straight. Bamber is also represented by two 10” x 14” watercolors of meticulously rendered photographs of her father (who died as a young man while she was still a child). A sunstruck black and white beach portrait (from 1966) and a flash-filled side-view of her father typing (based on a photo taken three years later and printed after his death) stubbornly record every nuance of the faded, original prints. Despite their fidelity to the snapshots, Bamber’s watercolors possess an elusive clumsiness that sidesteps sentimentality while subtly asserting her felt presence.
Mary Murphy has also cultivated a crafted approach to transcribing family photographs into psychologically charged paintings. Recognized in Philadelphia for her abstract paintings of interwoven, painted bands, in recent years Murphy has applied her fascination with the grid as image to the grid as an instrument of depiction. Mom, Dad, Maureen and Me translates a detail of a group portrait into a mosaic of 1200 one inch square gray tones, each loosely brushed and smudged into the next. The resulting distortion of detail accentuates facial features and anomalies, while alluding to the struggle of preserving identity within the often unspoken and repressive structures of family dynamics.
Indianapolis based artist Kevin Wolff is represented by two canvases that relate directly to his series of paintings of reflections exhibited in the 1993 Whitney Biennial. In Wall, False Hole, Mirror, Wolff depicts a photograph he took of a circle of black paper affixed to a mirror (unfocused) and a found photograph of an interior (beyond the mirror) into which a real hole has been cut. Mourning Picture represents a clipping (from a Spanish rock magazine) of two young men attached to a mirror tilted at an angle beyond which an inverted bouquet of roses hangs. One of the men, flattened and distorted by foreshortening, directs his eyes at the other, whose head has been cut out in a flower-shaped flap that hinges forward, parallel to the picture plane, his face and the scalloped edges that frame it sharply in focus. Both paintings’ play of gazes, reflections, and multiple methods of representing space suggest the baroque reflexivity of Valesquez’ Las Meninas, a work critic Hal Foster has suggested as a paradigm of photorealist practice.
Engaging cerebral puzzles are also posed by a pair of Los Angeles streetscapes by Peter Cain. Mobil and Glendale Boulevard might suggest the obsessive chaos of Richard Estes’ urban views were it not for Cain’s looser brushwork and suppression of all the usual commercial signage from these images of a gas station and convenience store. Devoid of the text and logos they would normally support, the blank display panels and banners assume an air of eerie expectation as they become more perfectly “new” again–as if they were models of themselves, uncompromised by actual application in the real world. Cain’s cityscapes participate in an unexpected dialogue not only with Edward Hopper but with Hans Hoffman and late Mondrian. Vacant of figures,they suggest a world customized for cars–the subjects of Cain’s earlier paintings (exhibited at the 1993 and 1995 Whitney Biennials) that earned him a cult following before his untimely death of a cerebral hemorrhage in 1997 at the age 37.
The deadpan depiction of cars, trucks, commercial graphics, and urban textures–glossy or gritty–attracted many of the original photorealists. This preoccupation with surfaces had more to do with the formal, pictorial, and illusionistic possibilities inherent in the appearance of these subjects than with any impulse toward critique or transformation. In a pair of 1989 paintings depicting the walls of a graffiti emblazoned underpass, London-based painter PAUL WINSTANELY demonstrates how the same, grungy urban subjects might be redeemed by the similar techniques. Rendered in foreshortened perspective, the cropped details of opposing walls, certain details obliterated by a blinding light at the terminus just past the frame, the uninflected pristine surfaces of these canvases imitate the texture of air brush–the very medium depicted in the painted image. The quotidian is rendered as a shimmering passage to the infinite.
Funded by the Arcadia Foundation, the Pennsylvania Council on the Arts, and the Advisory Board and Friends of the Beaver College Art Gallery.
A Closer Look 3
January 12 – February 14, 1999
January 12 – February 14, 1999
1998
Paul Ramirez-Jonas: "Not the old, not the new, but the necessary" sculpture, photographs, video
November 11 – December 17, 1998
November 11 – December 17, 1998
The Beaver College Art Gallery is pleased to present “Not the old, not the new, but the necessary,” an exhibition of sculpture, photographs and video by artist Paul Ramírez-Jonas on view from November 11 through December 17, 1998. Titled after a 1920 revolutionary slogan crafted by Russian constructivist Vladimir Tatlin, the show is a compact survey of works by this New York-based Latin American sculptor and chronicles his nostalgia for technological failures and utopian ideals brought down to earth and into the light of the everyday. Among the earliest works included are examples from Heavier Than Air (1993-95).
For this project Ramírez Jonas used white cotton fabric and wood slats to construct replicas of late-19th century “flying machines” developed by inventors such as Alexander Graham Bell, Lawrence Hargrave, Walter Brooks and others – all of whom were left in the dust by the Wright Brothers. Ramírez-Jonas equipped each of these kites with disposable cameras (triggered by mechanical alarm clocks), which, when flown off New York’s Robert Moses beach, snapped aerial views of the shore. Each of the resulting prints depicts a length of colored string stretching from the base of the airborne kite (just out of the picture frame) to a tiny figure below – Ramírez-Jonas clutching the other end of the tether. Objective proof of the flight of each craft, these dizzying, vertiginous images also capture the romance of invention despite the artist’s patent awareness of the impossibility of recreating history. This sense of exploration at a commonplace frontier is especially apparent in a projected videotape from 1997 entitled A Longer Day. Charged with the Einsteinian possibility of using speed to stretch time, this deceptively straightforward work is driven by a mind-over-matter aesthetic and the myth of “westward expansion.”
Leaving his New York studio at sunrise with his video camera pointing directly out his windshield, Ramírez-Jonas drove due west with the express purpose of taping the sunset (midway through Indiana), which he prolonged and repeated by traveling slightly faster than the speed limit. This optimistic work is paired with Red Ball (1997), a 73”-diameter slice of the top of what would be a 40-foot diameter rubber sphere. Standing on this silicon mound, we are reminded of the curvature of the earth. This natural fact – effectively camouflaged by the scale of our planet – is responsible for a host of persistent phenomena that form the core of many of the artist’s projects, A Longer Day notwithstanding.
The most recent work in the exhibition, “Not the old, not the new, but the necessary” (1998), is a reinterpretation of Tatlin’s 1919 Monument to the Third International. This triptych of color photographs depicts three views of a Babel-like tower of studio paraphernalia – a sculpture stand, various chairs, an LP of salsa music, an electric fan, plastic buckets, a text on Proust, a jar of water, etc., illuminated only by the headlight of a toy locomotive speeding up and down the pile on a moebius-like track. Taken with 20-minute exposures, these photographs render the circuit of the train as a perfect double spiral, a form whose mathematical precision contrasts sharply with the quotidian chaos of the ad hoc structure that supports it. The work becomes a reminder of the paradoxes that distinguish Tatlin’s Monument, a tower whose technological idealism guaranteed its practical failure but ensured its potency as a symbol of international socialism. Ramírez-Jonas’ pragmatic reiteration, like all of the artist’s works, is fueled by a lucid, do-it-your-selfer’s sense of purpose and immediacy. Writing about the pieces he has selected for this exhibition, the artist remarks that the works look both forward and backward in time with a sense of wonder and joy that embraces the constancy of the physical world. The pieces also suggest that human endeavors are part of that constancy as well. They offer a utopian vision not of a better tomorrow, but simply of a present that will always have a tomorrow and a yesterday. Ramírez-Jonas was born in Los Angeles in 1965, and was raised in Honduras. He moved back to the United States in 1985 to attend Brown University. He received his MFA from the Rhode Island School of Design in 1989 and moved to New York later the same year. In addition to three solo exhibitions at Postmasters Gallery in New York (in 1994, ‘96, and ‘97), and London’s White Cube (1994), his recent efforts include projects at Rojer Björkholmen Galleri (Stokholm, Sweden), and Studio Guenzani (Milan). He is currently preparing a large-scale clockwork performance for the city of Utrecht, Holland that premiers this spring.
The exhibition will be accompanied by “Anything but the Present,” an illustrated conversation between the artist and Kirby Gookin (art historian, critic and curator) scheduled directly prior to the opening reception on Wednesday, November 11 at 6:30 PM in Stiteler Auditorium, Murphy Hall, on the Beaver College Campus.
The exhibition and lecture are funded by the Arcadia Foundation, the Pennsylvania Council on the Arts, and the Friends and Advisory Board of the Beaver College Art Gallery.
Period Room: A Project by Amy Hauft
August 18 – November 1, 1998
August 18 – November 1, 1998
The Beaver College Art Gallery is pleased to present New York based artist Amy Hauft, whose sculpture practice involves interventions into galleries, museums, and non-traditional sites that in the words of the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art Curator, Connie Butler, have contributed to “the dissolve of the category that is installation art.” Hauft’s pieces often employ expansive planes of light-porous materials (theatre netting, organza, tracing paper) applied elegantly but pragmatically in response to the architecture of a given site to provide viewers with a refreshing awareness of the body in contact with a specific setting.
Installation view, “Period Room: A Project by Amy Hauft,” Beaver College Art Gallery
For her project at Beaver College Art Gallery, Hauft constructed a horizontal plane of caned plywood frames suspended at waist-level, wall-to-wall, throughout the 1200-square foot space. Three paths cut into this straw-colored, flood-like barrier led visitors to chaises designed and hand-caned by the artist. By integrating pathway, floor, and furniture at an exuberant scale, the installation both enveloped and supported the body, offering viewers the sensation of “wearing” space as if it were a garment. Lit from beneath by fluorescent fixtures and from above by natural light, the plane became transparent or opaque depending on the viewer’s position in the room.
Visitors were encouraged to recline in Hauft’s chairs, each of which offered ideal vantage points from which to view the 30-foot high, gabled ceiling and proto-modernist web of steel trusses that distinguish the 1893 structure that houses the gallery. Formerly a power station, the building was designed by Horace Trumbauer (1868-1938), a member of the team that drafted the plans for the Philadelphia Museum of Art (1911-28), whose many period rooms supply inspiration for Hauft’s project.
Hauft’s unprecedented application of caning—which we generally see in only discrete amounts of usually no more than one square foot at a time—is expanded from her installation at Beaver by the presentation of six historic cane chairs in area collections. These chairs were selected by the artist and designated at each venue by a free multiple—a printed cardboard disc that illustrated the chosen chair on one side and reproduced Hauft’s own hand caning on the other. Three of the chairs Hauft chose were determined as much for their sites as for the intrinsic beauty and history of the chairs. These venues included the second story Oval Parlor at Lemmon Hill (a federal mansion in Fairmount park), the Conservatory at Wyck (one of the oldest houses in Germantown), and the gallery at the Athenaeum of Philadelphia (a museum and library of decorative arts on Washington Square whose Reading Room is furnished with over 30 caned armchairs and stools).
The Heywood Brothers’ Recamier Settee (c. 1885-90) and Mies van der Rohe’s 1927 cantilever chair were presented on platforms at the Philadelphia Museum of Art in niches far from their original settings to provide viewers with a different perspective of the role these pieces play in the history of design. At the American Philosophical Society, one of a set of 34 popular chairs was placed in the lobby outside the Society’s famous library, which holds among other significant papers, all the historic records of Wyck.
Installation view, “Period Room: A Project by Amy Hauft,” Beaver College Art Gallery
Caning satisfies Hauft’s fascination for labor-intensive process and the deployment of spacious planes that restrain bodily passages yet can be seen through. Caning is also a potent cultural form rich in world history. A caned day-bed, for example, was among the treasures found in Tutankhamen’s tomb, although it is Indian craftsmen who are credited for developing the use of woven rattan reeds for the seats and backs of chairs. More resilient and durable than European alternatives, caned chairs were portable and ideal for use in warm weather. Despite their lightness and comfort, however, they were initially frowned upon because of their cheapness. Demonstrating an example of upward social mobility in furniture, caned chairs eventually found their way into the grandest and most splendid interiors of England. It was during the 1890s (during the construction of the power station that now houses the gallery) that the rage for caned seats in the United States reached its peak—a fashion imported from Great Britain prompted by interest in Oriental products. A century earlier, Philadelphia was the primary American port for receiving rolled cane from China—a form of mass-produced, pre-fabricated caning still in demand today and which Hauft matches deftly with her own hand-woven cane work. Her unique approach to craft embraces these and other historical references to create the compelling experience offered by her installation and the cultural matrix provided by the project as a whole.
“Hauft’s chosen material for her horizontal plane—rattan caning—evokes a 19th century milieu of crafts, natural substances, handmade furniture, and, in her terms, ‘Yankee ingenuity.’ Inspiring the work is her own memory while growing up in Philadelphia, of going to various museums and seeing period rooms—all those exquisitely ordered chambers filled with perfectly preserved chairs and sensible commodes, dining room tables and wall-hugging dressers, generated by a culture that, while prone to visionary utopianism, has equally prized a can-do utilitarianism. In teaching herself the craft of caning, Hauft developed not only a hands-on relationship to the labor-intensive technique but also a hands-on engagement with the whole lengthy order of pioneering, do-it yourself individualism, especially as revealed through well-crafted but eminently useful domestic objects.”
— Excerpt from the essay “The Exact and the Vast” by Gregory Volk in Period Room and Other Projects.
“Sitting in one of the chairs, a visitor is placed at eye level with the vast datum of cane. With head cast back, the eye races across the surface and then wanders to behold the volume of space overhead. A respite from the constricted passages, the chairs afford some observation of the imponderables of an architecture that began as a power house and now exists for the contemplation of art. But there is an irresistible temptation to see how things work—to discern the engineering of this illusory force. This great floating, illuminated plane is not some chimerical incident. It is dutifully held in place by wooden legs with a banister of fluorescent lights to sustain a consistent luminosity with the changing sunlight. To sit in the chair is both an acceptance and a defiance of gravity. Viewers can sense the visceral facts of the structure, but feel mysteriously suspended, nevertheless.”
— Excerpt from the essay “Period Room: The Topography of Transience” by Patricia C. Phillips in Period Room and Other Projects.
Senior Thesis Exhibition
May 1 – 22, 1998
May 1 – 22, 1998
Works on Paper
April 1 – 26, 1998
April 1 – 26, 1998
Juror: Mark Rosenthal, Curator, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York City, New York.
Participating Artists
Anthe, Jennifer Baker, Pay Boyer, Charles Burwell, Yane Calovski, Mark Campbell, Pete Checchia, Susan Crowder, Susan Deseyn, William Drake, Sandra Eliot, Tom Ferris, Hyunsoo Han, Marilyn Holsing, Judith Jacobson, Jeanne Jaffe, Kocot and Hatton, Anna Kuo, Shelly Inez Lependorf, Benjamin Long, Virgil Marti, Quentin Morris, Suzanne Okamoto, Sue Patterson, Stuart Rome, Lynca Schmid, Rita Siemienski Smith, Concha de la Serna, and Joseph Sweeny.
Kay Rosen: ABC (At Beaver College) Works Employing Alphabetical Sequences
February 16 – March 17, 1998
February 16 – March 17, 1998
The Beaver College Art Gallery is pleased to present “Kay Rosen: ABC (At Beaver College)” an exhibition of murals, paintings and drawings employing alphabetical sequences, on view from February 16 through March 17, 1998. The opening reception will take place on Monday evening, February 16, from 6:30 to 8:00 PM beginning with a lecture on Rosen’s work by Tom Sokolowski, Director of The Andy Warhol Museum, in the Stiteler Auditorium of Beaver’s Murphy Hall.
“ABC” provides an unusual opportunity to examine a series of integrally related pieces by an artist recognized for her innovations in the exploration of text as image. Each of the eight works in the exhibition draws on the deeply embedded, universal order of the English alphabet to reveal what Rosen refers to as “unofficial and coincidental encounters between structure and meaning.” In these characteristically bold and deceptively simple pieces (ranging from 1988 to the present,) Rosen mines the alphabet for examples of “pictorial onomatopoeia,” unearthing startling relationships between letter sequences as they are written, spoken, and named.
Rosen’s hair splitting attention to typestyle, color, cropping, and titles invests these unassuming samples of the alphabet with the ability to act in ways that conventional language rarely has a chance to. She creates conditions under which, instead of simply recognizing letters and words, as we do when we read standard texts, we can witness the release of dormant and unexpected meanings. The sequence D E F, for example, rendered with sign paint on canvas, speaks the title of Rosen’s painting, Deaf, a word in which we cannot hear the letter “a.” The addition of a period following the “v” in U Versus W (1995) transforms this three-letter sequence into a debate (U v. W) as well as a formal, typographical analysis. In addition to knowing the names of Rosen’s works, saying them aloud offers clues to their content. The puzzle behind the painted equation xy = z remains unsolved until its title, Xylophone is voiced by the viewer.
Other pieces in the exhibition are generated by Rosen’s nuanced disturbance of alphabetical progressions. The Beginning of a Byzantine Plot (1997), for example, continues the pattern of symmetrical inversion found in the first four letters of the word BYZAntine. The resulting narrative becomes too elaborate to follow, despite the rigor with which it is pursued. For The River (1988), the letters S T Y X are stacked between the banks of P Q R (above) and W V U (below). Reversing and backing up their natural flow, Rosen creates a verbal proxy of a mythological landscape.
Unlike the more declamatory voices used in the text-based work of artists such as Barbara Kruger and Jenny Holzer, Rosen opts for neutrality, even as she exposes the symbolic, patriarchal order represented by the alphabet –arguably one of the most influential instruments of control ever devised. The works included in “ABC,” with their persuasive, often humorous demonstrations of alternative readings of the alphabet, celebrate uncanny – yet seemingly inevitable – occurrences within this highly utilitarian tool.
Rosen’s manipulations, with their emphasis on the pictorial, tautological, and systemic possibilities of text, could be described as concrete poems and/or conceptual works, were they not so physically present as paintings, drawings, and environments. The two murals that feature prominently in the exhibition are cited specifically in response to a 34-foot long wall tinted sky – blue on one side of a shorter bisecting wall, and black on the other. Hand– painted in white against the blue are the first nine letters of the alphabet, the last two of which (colored yellow) spell the sunny American greeting of Rosen’s HI (1997 – 98). The alphabetical sequence continues on the other side of the wall from J to Q. The central letters of this group, LMNO (also painted yellow), comprise Rosen’s code for the Middle of a Film Noir (1990/97), a work that transforms the back gallery into a movie theater. Rosen’s linking of these two murals in the space echoes the way the word “alphabet” itself neatly fuses the first Greek letter, alpha to beta, the second.
Earlier this year, two billboard versions of HI were sited on Routes 15 and 144 in Lewisburg and Centre Hall, Pennsylvania, as part of a collaboration with Bucknell University’s Center Gallery. These two public works, presented anonymously, will remain on view through February 28, 1998.
Rosen, who will be on hand for the reception on February 16th, was born in Corpus Christi, Texas, and lives and works in Gary, Indiana. She received a B.A. from Tulane University and her M.A. in linguistics from Northwestern University. A recipient of three NEA Visual Arts Grants (in 1987, 1989, and 1995) and an Awards in the Visual Arts Fellowship (1990), she has presented her work in solo and group shows internationally since the early 1980s. In 1995 she was included in the group exhibition “Word for Word” (curated by Paula Marincola) at the Beaver College Art Gallery, where she presented a wall painting of her work Leak. Early next year, she will be the subject of a mid-career survey organized jointly by the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art and the Otis College of Art and Design.
“ABC” will be introduced with a lecture by Tom Sokolowski on Monday evening, February 16th at 6:30 pm in the Stiteler Auditorium. Prior to his appointment as director of the Andy Warhol Museum, Sokolowski was, for twelve years, director of New York University’s Gray Art Gallery and Study Center.
Faculty Choice Student Juried Exhibition
January 27 – February 8, 1998
January 27 – February 8, 1998
1997
Michael Lucero: Confounding Artifacts
November 10 – December 16, 1997
November 10 – December 16, 1997
Donald Moffett Blue (NY)
September 17 – October 29, 1997
September 17 – October 29, 1997
Senior Thesis Exhibition
April 25 – May 16, 1997
April 25 – May 16, 1997
Yukinori Yanagi
March 27 – April 20, 1997
March 27 – April 20, 1997
Faculty Exhibition
February 20 – March 16, 1997
February 20 – March 16, 1997
A Closer Look 2
January 16 – February 14, 1997
January 16 – February 14, 1997
1996
Patterns of Excess
November 7 – December 20, 1996
November 7 – December 20, 1996
Laughter Ten Years After
September 16 – October 27, 1996
September 16 – October 27, 1996
Senior Thesis Exhibition
April 26 – May 17, 1996
April 26 – May 17, 1996
Works on Paper
March 28 – April 21, 1996
March 28 – April 21, 1996
Endurance: The Information
January 17 – February 11, 1996
January 17 – February 11, 1996
1995
Ken Price: A Selected Survey (1960-1995)
November 9 – December 20, 1995
November 9 – December 20, 1995
Word for Word
September 14 – October 25, 1995
September 14 – October 25, 1995
Glenn Ligon and Gary Simmons: Selected Works
March 23 – April 24, 1995
March 23 – April 24, 1995
Faculty Exhibition
February 22 – March 15, 1995
February 22 – March 15, 1995
A Closer Look
January 18 – February 15, 1995
January 18 – February 15, 1995
1994
The Social Fabric
November 9 – December 20, 1994
November 9 – December 20, 1994
Mary Heilman: Paintings, Drawings, Ceramics
September 13 – October 28, 1994
September 13 – October 28, 1994
Works on Paper
March 30 – April 24, 1994
March 30 – April 24, 1994
Felix Gonzalez-Torres
February 14 – March 14, 1994
February 14 – March 14, 1994
Faculty Choice: An Exhibition of Student Work Selected by the Fine Arts Faculty
January 19 – February 4, 1994
January 19 – February 4, 1994
1993
Ap Gorny: If You Only Knew
November 9 – December 19, 1993
November 9 – December 19, 1993
Kenneth Goldsmith: 73 Poems – A Series of 80 Drawings
September 14 – October 21, 1993
September 14 – October 21, 1993
Fred Wilson
March 30 – April 20, 1993
March 30 – April 20, 1993
Works on Paper
February 22 – March 21, 1993
February 22 – March 21, 1993
Faculty Exhibition
January 11 – February 7, 1993
January 11 – February 7, 1993
1992
Boys and Girls Together: Recent Photography
November 10 – December 18, 1992
November 10 – December 18, 1992
Richard Prince: Joke Paintings and Protest Paintings
September 15 – October 25, 1992
September 15 – October 25, 1992
Senior Thesis Exhibition
April 24, 1992
April 24, 1992
Works on Paper
April 2 – 22, 1992
April 2 – 22, 1992
Daisy Youngblood: Sculpture 1980-1991
February 24 – March 20, 1992
February 24 – March 20, 1992
Student Juried Show
January 27 – February 14, 1992
January 27 – February 14, 1992
1991
Residue Politics
November 14 – December 20, 1991
November 14 – December 20, 1991
Thomas Nozkowski: Selected Paintings 1980–1990
September 16 – October 27, 1991
September 16 – October 27, 1991
Senior Thesis Exhibition
April 26 – May 10, 1991
April 26 – May 10, 1991
Works on Paper
April 3 – 21, 1991
April 3 – 21, 1991
Faculty Exhibition
March 8 – 24, 1991
March 8 – 24, 1991
Rona Pondick: Scrap
February 6 – March 3, 1991
February 6 – March 3, 1991
1990
Who's Afraid of Red, White and Blue? Works by Donald Lipski
November 9 – December 21, 1990
November 9 – December 21, 1990
Culture in Pieces: Other Social Objects
September 17 – October 24, 1990
September 17 – October 24, 1990
Senior Thesis Exhibition
May 10 – 26, 1990
May 10 – 26, 1990
Works on Paper
April 11 – May 6, 1990
April 11 – May 6, 1990
Beaver College Juried Student Art Exhibition
March 8 – 25, 1990
March 8 – 25, 1990
Phoebe Adams: Selected Works 1984–1989
February 8 – March 4, 1990
February 8 – March 4, 1990



